Podcast: Ariye Shater and Hariom Tatsat on AI explainability

The deployment of AI models in finance is a high-stakes business. Wrong decisions on loans, pricing, risk management or investments can be costly, and mishandling of information may be exploited for illegal activities. It is inherent in large language models (LLMs) that processes are not scripted and the output is not fully predictable.

AI agents bring an additional challenge. In time-dynamic operations, they might take initiatives that are harder to manage. In July 2026, OpenAI agents, supposedly confined in an offline testing environment, escaped human control and accessed the web before hacking Hugging Face, a website for AI model testing.

Such tools need to be monitored and their output explained, in finance or any other applications. “If we are rejecting the loan to a person using an AI model, we can’t just say that the AI model said so. We need to explain it. And the same thing applies to generative AI and agentic AI,” says Hariom Tatsat (pictured above, right), a senior quant in the risk AI/ML team at Barclays in New York.

 

Tatsat and Ariye Shater, who leads that team, worked on a method to monitor LLMs by using mechanistic interpretability, which focuses on reverse-engineering the model’s internal weights. The idea is to interpret the computational mechanisms that determine the activation of individual neurons in an AI system, assigning a meaning to each of them to read them semantically. A neuron is a single link or node in an LLM that combines with other neurons to find patterns.

To deal with the fact that neurons are polysemantic – in other words, they may carry multiple meanings at once – Tatsat and Shater apply sparse autoencoders to decode and identify the features they represent. Features need to be human-interpretable, so the authors suggest using open-source interpretability platforms such as Neuronpedia that provide labels exactly for this purpose. “It’s basically neuroscience of AI […] Some people also call it MRI for AI,” says Tatsat. “You can think of it as a microscope which looks inside the LLM and decouples different concepts and makes it more explainable.”

In a subsequent study to address challenges arisen in the past year, Tatsat and Shater used the same principles to build a system to monitor AI agents.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *