Detached endorsement slip tanks U.S. Bank’s Brooklyn foreclosure bid
U.S. Bank also submitted an affidavit from the president of its assignee to shore up its claim of holding the note when the case began. The court was not persuaded, citing recent Second Department decisions rejecting similar affidavits as proof of standing.
With the bank unable to clear even the threshold question of whether it had the right to sue, the appeals court affirmed denial of its summary judgment motion – a ruling that would have resolved the case without trial. The couple’s defense, built on lack of standing, held up without the court needing to weigh the borrowers’ other arguments.
That last detail matters. The court explicitly noted it did not need to consider the sufficiency of the borrowers’ opposing papers at all, because U.S. Bank failed to make its own case first. For lenders, that is the sharpest edge here: fall short on standing, and nothing else you file even gets looked at.
The case now heads back to trial court, where U.S. Bank will need to produce definitive evidence it held the original endorsed note when it sued – nearly four years ago. That is a heavy lift after losing on the issue at both the trial and appellate levels.
For mortgage servicers and foreclosure teams, the practical takeaway is narrow but important. Before filing, physically verify that every allonge is inseparable from the note it endorses. A detached slip – no matter how clear the endorsement – will not survive a standing challenge in New York’s Second Department.
