Oklahoma ballot measures threaten school property taxes

Oklahoma House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, a Republican
Republican House Speaker Kyle Hilbert said State Question 844 would fix “a flaw” preventing statewide consistency in the property tax incentive program.

Oklahoma Legislature

Oklahoma public school districts face threats to their property tax revenue from a potential trio of ballot measures this year, including one that could have consequences for bonds.

Processing Content

Voters will decide Tuesday the fate of State Question 844, a proposed constitutional amendment placed on the ballot by the legislature that would give lawmakers the ability to determine how much schools and local governments are reimbursed by the state to make up for revenue they lose from property tax exemptions used to entice manufacturing and research and development facilities.

Dr. Shawn Hime, executive director of the Oklahoma State School Boards Association, said the ballot measure does not address the actual exemptions granted to commercial facilities, but does remove a reimbursement guarantee from the state constitution by allowing any future legislature to determine how much, if any, schools are able to recoup, potentially affecting bond capacity.  

“If somehow the reimbursement goes down, this would then cause the bonding capacity to go down, and those citizens would have to pay the difference,” he said. “They wouldn’t receive that from the state as a reimbursement, so their local citizens’ portion of the taxes would go up.” 

Another proposed amendment that will appear on the Nov. 3 ballot seeks tighter caps on annual property assessment growth, while the Oklahoma Supreme Court is weighing the constitutionality of another measure for the fall election that would phase out homestead property taxes.

This week’s Question 844 would authorize the legislature “to enact laws establishing the levels and methodologies of reimbursement,” the ballot text says. “The laws are meant to ensure that no individual county receives reimbursement in an amount detrimental to other Oklahoma counties.”
It’s part of an election slate Tuesday that includes primary runoff elections in the Republican race for governor and the Democratic race for U.S. Senate.

In 1985, voters passed a constitutional amendment that created a five-year property tax exemption for new manufacturers coming to Oklahoma, according to , a nonpartisan research organization, as well as an Ad Valorem Reimbursement Fund, which receives 1% of state income tax revenue to return revenue lost to the tax exemptions to schools and other local governments. Reimbursements from the fund, which peaked at $161.18 million in tax year 2019, totaled $88.63 million in tax year 2025, according to the program’s latest annual report.

Fund falls short

Because the fund has not had sufficient money to fully replace revenue since 2002, the legislature stepped in to fill the gap, according to the Oklahoma Policy Institute. A general appropriations bill signed into law in April included a $62 million general fund transfer to the reimbursement fund.

Per-pupil state funding could also decrease if lower reimbursements force some districts currently not qualified for state aid due to their local revenue levels to become qualified, according to the school boards group.

“Since the Legislature appropriates one pool of money for the state aid formula, adding more districts to that pool means the available funding would be divided among more districts and more students,” it said. 

The Oklahoma Policy Institute announced its opposition to the measure last week, noting voters do not know what the new reimbursement formula would be.

“Voters are being asked to give this authority now and trust that lawmakers will make the right decisions later,” the group said. 

In an Aug. 12 guest column in The Oklahoman, Republican House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, who sponsored a resolution to place the measure on the ballot, said it would fix “a flaw” that allows each county’s assessor to establish a property’s valuation during the five-year exemption period without a mechanism to ensure statewide consistency. After the exemption expires, companies in many cases succeed in appealing for a lower assessed value, he added.

“Property owners who reside in school districts who issued bonds based on the assessed values during those first five years, can find themselves in a predicament if the assessment was not done properly,” he wrote. “When the valuations are later reduced, those property owners can face difficult financial adjustments because the tax base no longer matches what was originally projected and what is now legally obligated to be paid to bondholders.”  

Ahead of an April Senate vote on the resolution, sponsor Republican Senate President Pro Tempore Lonnie Paxton said state reimbursements have become “very, very expensive.”

“This simply puts a little bit of that control back in us as a legislature to determine how much that ad valorem reimbursement could be,” he said, adding it would result in a more-affordable process for the state, while affected local governments and schools will receive a tax revenue “windfall” when the five-year exemptions expire. 

State government is flush

Earlier this month, Gov. Kevin Stitt announced the general fund ended fiscal 2026 on June 30 $612 million above estimates and $142 million higher than fiscal 2025 collections even as the state has reduced and restructured the personal income tax and eliminated its tax on groceries in recent years.   

Oklahoma’s considerable reserves and fund balances helped earn rating upgrades from Fitch Ratings, Moody’s Ratings, and S&P Global Ratings since 2024. 

A proposed constitutional amendment – State Question 847 – lawmakers put on the Nov. 3 ballot asks voters to lower annual property assessment growth caps from the current 5% for most real property and 3% for owner-occupied residences and agricultural land to 4% and 1.75% respectively, starting in tax year 2027.

Annual revenue loss estimates for school and county operations by the Oklahoma Policy Institute range from an initial $42 million to $575 million in 10 years. Oklahoma cities cannot levy property taxes for operations, but can obtain voter approval for property tax-backed GO bonds.

Another measure that may appear on the November ballot is the subject of a court battle. The initiative petition launched by current and former Republican state lawmakers seeks to gradually exempt via state statute the assessed value of owner-occupied residential property from taxation starting in 2027 until 100% is exempted in 2029. 

Opponents told the state Supreme Court that it would result in an at least $1.52 billion annual revenue loss that would hit schools the most without a remedy to replace the lost money.   

They contend the measure violates multiple provisions of the Oklahoma Constitution, including uniformity.

The exemptions would not apply to property taxes levied to pay off existing bonds, according to a court filing by the measure’s proponents.  

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *