Elderly Homeowners Facing ‘Seniority Tax’ During Refinance Process
A recent report from Bankrate has unveiled a confluence of factors contributing to Seniority Tax: a stagnant housing market has diminished mortgage demand, prompting lenders to seek alternative revenue through mortgage refinancing.
Older Americans represent a particularly appealing demographic for refinancing, as they constitute the majority of homeowners and possess unprecedented levels of equity that can be accessed through cash-out refinancing.
The investigation, which involved interviews with 14 home loan experts and industry insiders, along with recent evaluations of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) complaint database, reveals that the Seniority Tax is not merely coincidental. It stems from a deeply entrenched industry culture that favors loan sales over the best interests of consumers.
This demographic is at an increased risk of being persuaded into refinancing when it may not be prudent, with some mortgage professionals employing highly personal strategies and tactics to secure commissions—moving beyond simple mailers that promise savings in bold red letters. One loan officer, who conducted cold calls to older homeowners, reported feeling pressured to persuade them to refinance, partly by offering a deferred payment that could be used for a “trip to visit their grandchildren,” according to the report.

Refinancing Costs, Concerns & More
Being compelled to refinance—whether it involves extending the term on a cash-out refinance or accepting a higher interest rate on a rate-and-term refinance, among other common scenarios—can lead to significant repercussions: Utilizing Hidden Homeownership Tax data, we estimate that the Seniority Tax associated with refinancing could result in an average loss of over $52,000 for homeowners over the course of a 30-year mortgage. Although a long-term mortgage is seldom advisable for older borrowers, it does occur, even among seniors who are well into the repayment of their original loan, as indicated by the CFPB analysis.
Given that the repercussions of overpayment can extend over many years, even decades, the impact is not limited to the older homeowner—their heirs may also experience a reduction in value from a future home sale. Regardless of the circumstances, mortgage refinancing can be a viable solution for older homeowners, whether through a cash-out refinance to leverage equity for necessary expenses or a rate-and-term refinance to lower monthly or long-term payments. However, they must first evade the Seniority Tax and questionable sales strategies.
| Applicant age group | Overpayment rate | Average spread between offered interest rate (basis points) | Average 8-year overpayment | Average lifetime overpayment |
| Under 35 | 72% | 76 | $15,855 | $48,956 |
| 35 to 44 | 76% | 95 | $20,279 | $59,727 |
| 45 to 54 | 81% | 111 | $22,378 | $62,559 |
| 55-plus | 81% | 101 | $19,034 | $52,108 |
As one ages, it is expected that one’s financial situation improves. By this stage, you are likely to have built up equity in your home, and studies indicate that your credit score tends to be significantly higher than the average scores of younger generations. Ideally, consumers should have the ability to secure loans at the most favorable rates available.
This is partly what makes the Seniority Tax so perplexing. Recent data from Bankrate, which expands on our Hidden Homeownership Tax report, reveals that both the likelihood and the extent of overpaying on mortgage refinancing increases with the age of the applicant. Specifically, borrowers aged 55 and above tend to overpay by nearly $2,400 annually on mortgage refinancing, which is approximately $400 more than the tax burden faced by those aged 35 and under.
This recent report corroborates findings from the Hidden Homeownership Tax report, indicating that in 2025, borrowers aged 55 and above were more inclined than their younger counterparts to refinance into loans with higher costs than their financial situations warranted. Consequently, they incurred greater expenses compared to younger borrowers. This led to them paying a larger proportion of their loan balance in excess interest throughout the duration of the mortgage. On average, the estimated lifetime Seniority Tax amounted to approximately 19% to 20% of their loan balance.
| Metric | Loan 1: Getting a competitive rate | Loan 2: Facing the Seniority Tax |
| Interest rate | 6.75% | 7.76% |
| Monthly principal-and-interest payment | $1,624 | $1,759 |
| Overall cost of repayment | $460,196 | $508,802 |
Lenders Aiming to “Sell Refis” to Aging Owners
In 2025, refinancing primary mortgages regained its position as the most favored mortgage product for individuals aged 55 and above, as indicated by HMDA data. According to Bankrate sources, lenders with a significant number of commission-driven mortgage loan originators, rather than typical credit unions, community banks, or even local lenders or brokers, are the most likely to capitalize on the chance to market refinancing to this substantial demographic.
“A lot of these call-center lenders, their whole thing is they have a team of people that sit on the phone and call all day long,” said Michael Parker, a manager at a wholesale mortgage broker based in North Carolina. “That’s all they do.”
Parker indicates that these lenders can utilize public records to determine your loan balance and identify the company servicing your mortgage. A caller might assert, “I’m contacting you about your loan with so-and-so lender,” even if they are not genuinely associated. He emphasizes that people of any age can be targeted by these methods, but senior citizens are especially susceptible.
Nonetheless, the 2025 Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act prohibits mortgage trigger leads, thereby making it more challenging for unscrupulous refinancing lenders to gather data for aggressive sales calls.
“However, [the ban] is not a comprehensive solution that will eliminate all unsolicited telemarketing calls from lenders,” said Patrick Crotty, a senior attorney at the National Consumer Law Center.
In reality, similar tactics are occurring daily at even prominent, well-known lenders, as indicated by our investigation. Five former loan originators who were involved in refinancing at a national lender report that internal safeguards were disregarded to “sell” refinancing options to older individuals, even when it was not in their best interest.
Incentives included one or two deferred monthly payments, an escrow “refund,” or cash-out options for borrowers who had sufficient savings. In certain situations, an older borrower may be informed that refinancing is an effortless way to obtain cash.
To read more, click here.