Possible Senate EPW leader shift with permitting bill in spotlight

Secretary Of State Rubio Testifies Before Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Oregon Democrat Sen. Jeff Merkley could chair the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee next year.

Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg

If Democrats take control of the Senate in next week’s midterm elections, Oregon progressive Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley may take the helm of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee as a long-awaited bipartisan permitting reform aimed at making it easier to build infrastructure is in play.

Processing Content

Senate EPW Ranking Democrat Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., a climate hawk who helped craft the permitting bill, is expected to chair the Senate Judiciary Committee if Democrats win the Senate. Merkley is likely to take the EPW gavel, although he may face competition from Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass.

Merkley is currently ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, and sits on the Appropriations, Foreign Relations and Rules and Administration committees. He has said he would make a decision about chairing EPW after the midterms, according to Politico.

Merkley was first elected to the Senate in 2008. In 2010, he co-authored the so-called Volcker Rule in the Dodd-Frank Act, which led to the complete restructuring of tender option bond programs because it banned banks and their affiliates from sponsoring a TOB program, owning a residual certificate issued by a TOB trust, or providing credit enhancement, liquidity, or remarketing services to these programs.

In August, Merkley was one of nine Democratic senators who urged the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to crack down on prediction markets’ offering contracts for individuals to bet on wildfires.

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., would remain in the chair’s seat if Republicans retain control of the upper chamber.

The EPW panel is important to the municipal bond market as it oversees transportation and infrastructure spending, public works as well as environmental policy and how the Federal Emergency Management Agency administers disaster relief.

The committee may take up its portion of the surface transportation reauthorization after the midterms, Capito has said, although many observers think the bill will be punted to next year.

The panel will be in the spotlight as the permitting bill — the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026 — could be taken up for a key procedural vote as soon as Nov. 9, during an already busy lame duck session.

Capito and Whitehouse helped write the bill, which aims to speed up infrastructure projects with a comprehensive overhaul of the notoriously complex federal permitting process. Lawmakers released the measure in late September before Congress adjourned.

The bill marks a rare area of bipartisanship, although the alliance is fragile. Four Democrats, including Merkley, on Tuesday sent a letter to the bill’s authors saying “the promise of BAAJA will only succeed if President Trump takes care that it is faithfully executed. The Trump administration’s record gives us no basis to assume that he will.”

The bill would accelerate federal review schedules by narrowing the amount of federal actions currently required for National Environmental Protection Act review, expanding categorical exclusions and enforcing stricter schedules for objecting to projects.

It would also protect already-issued permits by blocking agencies from revoking or altering federal authorizations for projects with nonfederal sponsors that were in effect after September.

The bill brings benefits to states, said the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, by improving project certainty and delivery.

AASHTO president Russell McMurry called it a “major step in supporting our nation’s state DOTs to speed up delivery of projects and their tangible safety and quality of life benefits for all communities.”

Meanwhile, a group of nine attorneys general from Democratic states last week sent a letter to Senate leaders saying the bill, without amendment, would “intrude upon states’ rights, harm critical resources in our states, and create uncertainty in ways that undermine the purposes of the bill.”

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *